Saturday, September 29, 2012
Monday, September 3, 2012
Appellate Court Upholds Right of Public Housing Tenants to Invite Guests
In a significant victory for public housing tenants, Onondaga
County Court (Aloi, J.) ruled on August 23, 2012, that guests of those
tenants could not be arbitrarily arrested for criminal trespass. In People v Finch,
(Index #11-0627), Mr. Finch, whose girlfriend and infant son lived in
public housing, was told by Syracuse police officers to stay off the
premises. He was arrested and charged with three counts of criminal
trespass and one count of resisting arrest, and was convicted after
trial in Syracuse City Court of two of the trespass counts and the
resisting arrest.
On appeal the County Court reversed and dismissed the trespassing convictions, finding that, “[A] tenant with a lease to a specific apartment in an apartment complex has the inherent right to invite guests and therefore those guests by virtue thereof are “licensed and privileged” to be in or upon the property. Clearly, residents of a multi-unit apartment complex and their “invited guests” have license or privilege to be in or upon the property and cannot be found guilty of the crime of criminal trespass without more [proof] (see People v Graves, 72 NY2d 160; People v Bazile, 20 Misc3d 1127A).” The Court found that the prosecutor did not meet their burden of proving that Mr. Finch”entered or remained unlawfully” as there was no showing that his license had been revoked. County Court paradoxically affirmed the resisting arrest charge, finding that officer had probable cause to arrest Mr. Finch even though they knew that he was the lawful guest of an existing tenant.
Mr. Finch was represented by Philip Rothschild, Senior Attorney, Hiscock Legal Aid Society Appeals Program. The brief is here.
On appeal the County Court reversed and dismissed the trespassing convictions, finding that, “[A] tenant with a lease to a specific apartment in an apartment complex has the inherent right to invite guests and therefore those guests by virtue thereof are “licensed and privileged” to be in or upon the property. Clearly, residents of a multi-unit apartment complex and their “invited guests” have license or privilege to be in or upon the property and cannot be found guilty of the crime of criminal trespass without more [proof] (see People v Graves, 72 NY2d 160; People v Bazile, 20 Misc3d 1127A).” The Court found that the prosecutor did not meet their burden of proving that Mr. Finch”entered or remained unlawfully” as there was no showing that his license had been revoked. County Court paradoxically affirmed the resisting arrest charge, finding that officer had probable cause to arrest Mr. Finch even though they knew that he was the lawful guest of an existing tenant.
Mr. Finch was represented by Philip Rothschild, Senior Attorney, Hiscock Legal Aid Society Appeals Program. The brief is here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)